ONCALL
...
Family Law
......Procedure After Trial/Hearing
36 Cards On This Topic:
Even if the dismissal could be deemed void rather than voidable for purposes of CCP §473(d), substantial evidence supported conclusion that D ratified his atty's unauthorized settlement agrmt. by failing to object and take steps to rectify the matter.
Appeal in grandparent visitation case dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction where mother filed notice of appeal beyond the 60-day deadline.
Timely filed motion to set aside default properly denied as it was not accompanied by a proposed responsive pleading.
May not use sanctions order to challenge a nonappealable order quashing an SDT, and then use trial court's analysis to review a separate order Court of Appeal ruled could not be appealed.
Entry of default against D vacated where application was "in proper form" despite no responsive pleading and "was not in fact caused by" the attorney's neglect. (CCP §473(b).)
To avoid implied findings supporting order, party must bring ambiguities and omissions in the factual findings of the statement of decision to the trial court's attention.
Clerk's renewal of 2008 judgment, where renewal request didn't specify judgment debtor’s capacity, was a clerical error, and court properly corrected it.
When electronic filing problems delay notice of appeal.
Stipulated judgment, which D lessee agreed to accept in breach of lease K, was the exact amount of damages P suffered, not a penalty or liquidated damage provision.
Court of Appeal has inherent authority to dismiss frivolous appeals.
Issue preclusion does not prevent a second judge from finding a marriage to be void in CA despite another judge’s having found it valid where contracted.
Duress by a third person cannot void a contract when the other contracting party did not know about the duress and relied in good faith.
Failure to make reasonable inquiry to ascertain or effort to understand the meaning and content of the contract precludes rescission for unilateral mistake of fact.
Statement of decision is required in custody cases involving Fam. Code §3044.
Appellate court cannot become appellant's lawyer; failure to show legal error compels affirmance of judgment.
Issue preclusion discussed.
Family law courts are courts of equity and may amend final adoption contracts where equity demands it.
Neither evidence of intentional or deliberate misrepresentation is required for the doctrine of equitable estoppel to apply.
Fam. Code §4320 does not require express findings, only that the court “consider all of the following circumstances"; the weight to give each factor is up to the court.
It is better practice to make express findings on all relevant 4320 factors when ruling on a modification motion, not just ones which have changed.
Default judgment set aside where based on invalid substituted service.
Void judgment may be set aside at any time without regard to six-month limit in CCP §473.
Acts in excess of jurisdiction usually valid until set aside.
An attorney may not settle a client’s case over the client’s objection and any provision of a retainer agreement purporting to give an attorney such authority violates the RPC and is void.
No mandatory §473 relief where attorney not representing defendants at time default was entered.
A judgment which awards relief not available under the law is voidable.
Conflicts between the written order and reporter's transcript are usually resolved in favor of the latter with the discrepancies presumed to be clerical in nature.
Equitable relief from a default judgment is reserved for exceptional circumstances and Ds' failure to inform of their current address did not qualify.
Extrinsic fraud and extrinsic mistake are unavailable when a party’s own negligence allows the fraud or mistake to occur.
Extrinsic mistake distinguished from extrinsic fraud.
P#2’s last day to file her notice of appeal was the day the court reopened after the emergency Covid-19 orders expired.
A defective motion for reconsideration is not “valid” and does not extend the time to appeal.
A Ruling which disposes of all of the issues in the case is the appealable order even if followed by a written order.
A Motion for Reconsideration may not be entertained after the entry of a final appealable judgment.
Trial court has no power to sua sponte reconsider a previous order based on new evidence-doing so amounts to an improper granting of a new trial.